By Daniel Taylor
On June 18, the Vatican is scheduled to release Pope Francis’ letter addressing climate change to the world.
One of the speakers who will present the letter is Professor John Schnellnhuber, founding director of the Postdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Schnellnhuber has advised German President Angela Merkel on the threat of global warming. As reported by Breitbart, the professor has stated that the world is overpopulated by 6 billion people.
Schnellnhuber is well known for promoting draconian measures to combat climate change. In 2009 he proposed a CO2 budget for every individual on the planet. He has also put forth a “Master Plan” for transforming society that involves creating a system of world government including an earth constitution, a global council and a planetary court.
Global warming science itself is surrounded by fraud. There is also a globalist agenda that is depending on the survival of the idea of global warming.
In a 1991 report titled “The First Global Revolution” published by the Club of Rome, we find the following statement: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
In the 1970’s, the World Order Models Project, financed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Rockefeller foundation, proposed “strategies of transition” into a new global era. Saul H. Mendlovitz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, directed the project. Richard A. Falk, also a member of the CFR, contributed academic work.
One of the goals of the project was to use symbolic leaders of the world to promote the globalist ideas of WOMP and “…break down decades of adherence to [the Westphalian system] and its infrastructure of values, perceptions and institutions.”
The project specifically named the Pope as a potential spokesman for the agenda.
If redistribution of wealth and personal CO2 budgets are in store for the west in response to “climate change”, its values, perceptions and institutions most certainly need to be broken down.