In a
sweeping move that has garnered surprisingly little
attention this week the United States and the
European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic
economic partnership that will see regulatory
standards "harmonized" and will lay the basis for a
merging of the US and EU into one single market, a
huge step on the path to a new globalized world
order.
The
BBC reported
from the Summit in Washington
on Monday:
The two
sides agreed to set up an "economic council" to
push ahead with regulatory convergence in nearly
40 areas, including intellectual property,
financial services, business takeovers and the
motor industry.
Skipping over what the fall out from a single
Western market will be, the BBC simply announced
"The aim is to increase trade and lower costs."
before moving swiftly on to analyse what this means
in terms of global warming.
While
the masses are being whipped up into a never ending
frenzy over climate change at every given
opportunity, hardcore political actions that will
affect the lives of everyone on the planet in the
here and now are being skated over with little or no
attention being paid to them.
The
proponents and architects of a one world order have
worked long and hard behind the scenes for a long
time pushing a gradual erosion of national
sovereignty via a harmonization of all areas of
life, economic, social, cultural and environmental.
Such
harmonization and elimination of diversity is the
only way to maximize the profit of the few at the
expense of the many, while maintaining tight
controls over society as a whole in order for a long
continuation of that status quo.
The
global corporate elite are the only ones who will
benefit from essentially wiping out the free market
and eliminating economic competition across nations.
The
EU has long been used as a tool for such harmonizing
globalization and has now reached the point at which
it has become a supranational federal government for
Europe. Over the years, what was originally sold as
a simple free trade treaty has slowly been built
from the bottom up into an all encompassing
monolithic authority over the entire region.
The
areas it now seeks to dominate also include public
health, social policy, transport, justice,
agriculture, fisheries, energy, economic and social
cohesion, the environment, internal and external
trade, and consumer protection.
It has recently been
highlighted that European globalists such as
Britain's Tony Blair and Germany's Angela Merkel are
seeking to implement by stealth areas of the EU
constitution regardless of its blanket rejection by
voters.
Senior British Cabinet
sources have warned
that they are also pushing
hard for Brussels to be given a full-time unelected
president, who would serve a five year term and
speak as the voice of Europe on the world stage.
It is commonly accepted that
reforms to strengthen the European Parliament,
scheduled to be implemented
before 2009,
could undermine the ability of member states to opt
out of EU laws, as Britain does at present,
effectively ending national sovereignty.
In their important history of
the
EU, The Great Deception,
British authors Christopher Booker and Richard
North, concluded that the 27 member nations now
entangled in the union have ceded their sovereignty
in a carefully planned stealth operation. They
grudgingly credit european globalists with
accomplishing "a slow-motion coup d’etat: the most
spectacular coup d’etat in history."
The authors of The
Great Deception summarized the effect of the Treaty
of Rome: "Thus did the central deception of the
whole story become established. From now on, the
real agenda, political integration, was to be
deliberately concealed under the guise of economic
integration. Building Europe was to be presented as
a matter of trade and jobs."
In addition
dissidents and outcasts such as
Vladimir Bukovksy
have warned that an elite plan
has long existed whereby the EU would be hijacked
and transformed into a Soviet style Socialist
superstate that would eliminate the individual
nation state's power and create a governing body
with no accountability or direct representation.
In 2003 the
BBC uncovered incredible archived documents which
confirmed that both the EU and its single currency,
the Euro, were the brainchild of the secretive
Bilderberg Group.
Some 50 years BEFORE the implementation of the
European single currency, Bilderberg, now infamous
as the secret elite hand behind world events, had
drawn up the plans.
In addition to
the EU,
an agenda for a North
American Union
is now beyond doubt and is well on course according
to the internal policy documents of its unelected
legislators, the Council on Foreign Relations.
The CFR's North
American Union mirrors Bilderberg's European Union.
In the CFR's document,
Building a North American
Community,
mention is given to the Bilderberg group in a
recommendation that private bodies be formed to
direct policy between Canada, Mexico, and the United
States. The document states:
"To ensure a
regular injection of creative energy into the
various efforts related to North American
integration, the three governments should
appoint an independent body of advisers. This
body should be composed of eminent persons from
outside government, appointed to staggered
multiyear terms to ensure their independence.
Their mandate would be to engage in creative
exploration of new ideas from a North American
perspective and to provide a public voice for
North America. A complementary approach would be
to establish private bodies that would meet
regularly or annually to buttress North American
relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg..."
Very much like
the EU, provisions for a NAU such as NAFTA and GATT
were sold at their inception as free trade
agreements. As time has progressed we have witnessed
the birth of the "Security
and Prosperity Partnership",
a treaty, which seems to be a little more than a
simple economic agreement, between leaders of the
US, Mexico and Canada that has been agreed without
Congressional oversight.
A
Canadian report
has described the SPP as "an
international framework for trilateral and bilateral
cooperation in North America" that is "not a formal
international treaty" or "an overarching binding
legal agreement." But what is an "international
framework" that commits U.S. officials from various
federal agencies to working with officials of two
other countries? Why is such a process not subjected
to congressional scrutiny and approval?
Last
September we reported that Journalist Jerome Corsi
had received the first documents pertaining to a
FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP
office in its activities towards creating a
Pan American Union.
The documents show
thata wide range of US
administrative law is being re-written in stealth
under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize"
with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just
as has become commonplace within the EU.
The documents
contain references to upwards of 13 working groups
within an entire organized infrastructure that has
drawn from officials within most areas of
administrative government including U.S. departments
of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury,
Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and
Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade
Representative.
Corsi
also reportedthat at a recent
high-level confab in Banff, an assistant U.S.
secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a
panel that featured a presentation by Prof. Robert
Pastor, author of a book promoting the development
of a North American union as a regional government
and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary
currency to replace the dollar and the peso.
Just a conspiracy
theory? Not according to Steve Previs of Jefferies
International who stated on CNBC, "I think one thing
for people who are dollar based need to focus on is
the Amero, that's the one thing that nobody is
talking about that I think is going to have a big
impact... on everybody's life in Canada, the U.S.
and Mexico..."
A
global crash, predicted by former World Bank chief
economist and nobel prize winner
Joseph Stiglitz,
and a totally devalued dollar that can barely rival the
peso are greasing the skids for a single North American
currency. This spells disaster for all Americans who
wish to maintain their standard of living and not find
themselves barefoot on the street in a bread queue.
The
decline of the economy in the US is being caused by the
very predatory globalist policies of the IMF and World
Bank that are still presented to us as the solution for
economic turmoil. These two globalist vampires have
drained the third world dry, and are now focusing their
attention on enslaving the developed world.
The
single currency and a 'new economic order' is a major
step on the road to global governance. Europe already
has its own strong single currency, while the dollar's
days seem to be numbered. When money is being printed by
a private corporation is it any surprise to see a push
for a merger with other countries' currencies?
Talk has
long been of a global currency by 2018 if plans go
accordingly. A 1988 famous cover of The Economist
emphasized this, depicting a phoenix standing atop
burning paper money symbolizing its rise out of their
destruction, with the words "Get ready for a world
currency" next to it.
The article carried in The
Economist, titled "Get Ready for the Phoenix," stated
that, "THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese,
Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and
some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for
their shopping with the same currency."
The
article went on to state that sovereignty will be lost
with the advent of the new currency, but that trends
towards globalization are already doing away with it
anyway.
"The phoenix
zone would impose tight constraints on national
governments. There would be no such thing, for
instance, as a national monetary policy. The
world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new
central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF.
The world inflation rate - and hence, within
narrow margins, each national inflation rate-
would be in its charge. Each country could use
taxes and public spending to offset temporary
falls in demand, but it would have to borrow
rather than print money to finance its budget
deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax,
governments and their creditors would be forced
to judge their borrowing and lending plans more
carefully than they do today. This means a big
loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends
that make the phoenix so appealing are taking
that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a
world of more-or-less floating exchange rates,
individual governments have seen their policy
independence checked by an unfriendly outside
world."
"Pencil
in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it
comes," the article concludes.
In
2004 Robert Mundell, the Nobel-prize winning economist
often credited with paving the way to the European
single currency,
called for a global currency.
In an
interview with French paper Libération, Mundell said:
"With the emergence of the euro and its instability
against the dollar, Europe, the United States and the
Asian powers should come together and create a new
international monetary system."
In
2006 the scandal-ridden and highly secretive Bank For
International Settlements, considered to be the world's
top central banking policy, released a policy paper that
called for the end of national
currencies in favor
of a global model of currency formats.
The BIS
is a branch of the of the Bretton-Woods International
Financial architecture and closely allied with the
Bilderberg Group. It is controlled by an inner elite
that represents all the world's major central banking
institutions. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most
influential economist of all time, wanted it closed down
as it was used to launder money for the Nazis in World
War II.
It
appears we are now seeing the slow realization of a
gloabal economic system with a single currency.
The end
game of such regionalizing harmonization is of course a
global government.
It has
long been recognized that an instant world government
would be roundly rejected by the masses and that a
stepping stone agenda, a stealth implementation of a new
global order is the key to its success.
Writing
in the April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs, the flagship
publication of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),
Richard N. Gardner , who has held a number of State
Department posts, argued against what he called "instant
world government." Instead, he wrote, "the 'house of
world order' will have to be built from the bottom up
rather than from the top down. It will look like a great
'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James'
famous description of reality, but an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal
assault."
In a
similar sentiment, former National Security Adviser
Zbigniew Brzezinski pointed to "regionalization" as the
key for "globalization" in his address to Gorbechev's
State of the World Forum in October 1995: "The
precondition for eventual globalization — genuine
globalization — is progressive regionalization, because
thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more
cooperative units."
This week
we have witnessed the first steps towards the biggest
"cooperative unit" there has ever been with the
groundwork being set for a EU-US single market. However,
as the CFR would say, amidst the "booming, buzzing
confusion" few have noticed.
Daniel Taylor of
Old-thinker news
contributed research to this
report.