|
A Tyranny That
Goes Straight to the Soul
"...despotism corrupts the person who submits to it far more than the
person who imposes it."
Old-Thinker News |
September 12, 2008
By Daniel Taylor
Alexis de Tocqueville observed the
American way of life, government and politics when the country was still
young in 1835. His observations show that while there are new problems
and social issues today, many of them have haunted this country since
its early days.
Tocqueville's observations, in his own
words, will be biting and offensive to some Americans, but this is only
because the truth in
what he says cannot be avoided. He saw a new kind of tyranny rising that was
more effective than brute force, a tyranny that went straight to the
soul. Tocqueville writes,
"Chains and executioners: such
were the crude instruments on which tyranny once relied. But
civilization has today brought improvement to everything, even to
despotism, which seemed to have nothing left to learn.
Princes made violence a physical
thing, but today's democratic republics have made it as intellectual
as the human will it seeks to coerce. Under the absolute government
of one man, despotism tried to reach the soul by striking crudely at
the body; and the soul, eluding such blows, rose gloriously above
it. Tyranny in democratic republics does not proceed in the same
way, however. It ignores the body and goes straight for the soul.
The master no longer says: You will think as I do or die. He says:
You are free not to think as I do. You may keep your life, your
property, and everything else. But from this day forth you shall be
as a stranger among us. You will retain your civic privileges, but
they will be of no use to you... You will remain among men, but you
will forfeit your rights to humanity. When you approach your fellow
creatures, they will shun you as one who is impure. And even those
who believe in your innocence will abandon you, lest they, too, be
shunned in turn. Go in peace, I will not take your life, but the
life I leave you with is worse than death."
Tocqueville describes this tyranny as
it expressed itself in America during his day,
"In America, the majority erects a
formidable barrier around thought. Within the limits thus laid down,
the writer is free, but woe unto him who dares to venture beyond
those limits... He has no chance of a political career, for he has
offended the only power capable of opening the way to one... In the
end, he gives in, he bends under the burden of such unremitting
effort and retreats into silence, as if he felt remorse for having
spoken the truth."
One thing has remained the same
throughout history; The corruptive nature of tyrannical power and its
effects on those who wield it as well as those who submit to it.
Tocqueville saw different types of people, those who submit to tyranny
out of weakness, habit, ignorance, or love of power.
"In absolute governments, the high
nobles who surround the throne flatter the passions of the master
and voluntarily bend to his whims. But the masses of the nation are
not inclined toward servitude; often they submit out of weakness,
habit, or ignorance, and occasionally out of love for royalty or the
king. It is not unknown for a people to take pleasure and pride of a
sort of sacrificing their will to that of the prince, thereby
marking a kind of independence of soul in the very act of obedience.
In such nations degradation is far less common than misery. There is
a great difference, moreover, between doing what one does not
approve of and pretending to approve of what one does: one is the
attitude of a man who is weak, the other a habit that only a lackey
would acquire."
Tocqueville also saw a stark
difference between the leaders in America and the people.
"I have heard Americans speak of
their homeland. I have met with true patriotism among the people; I
have often searched for it in vain among their leaders. This fact is
easily understood by analogy: despotism corrupts the person who
submits to it far more than the person who imposes it. In absolute
monarchies, the king often has great virtues, but the courtiers are
always vile."
Were all Americans always so
malleable? Tocqueville describes a unique character that filled the
souls of Americans in earlier days.
"When the American Revolution
declared itself, remarkable men came forward in droves. In those
days, public opinion gave direction to their wills but did not
tyrannize them. The famous men of the day freely took part in the
intellectual movement of their time yet possessed a grandeur all
their own. Their brilliance, rather than being borrowed from the
nation, spilled over onto it."
The establishment media has served,
among other things destructive to our liberty, to marginalize truth
tellers, whistle blowers, and groups who pose a threat to established
thought and power. We are to believe that we are alone. No one else feels the way
we do, so we are told. Fortunately for us, a variety of developments
have effectively broken this mechanism of control for millions. The
internet is connecting like minded people world-wide, and the
alternative media is exploding.
Bring back the grandeur and
independence of thought that once filled this nation. Tyranny has been
brought to a science while sophisticated social engineering practices
have emerged in the many years after Tocqueville's writing, but even
they cannot take hold of your soul.
|