Tuesday, October 16, 2007
home contact  

Police State U.S.A
On track with the U.K, the United States of America is becoming increasingly authoritarian every day

Print article

Old-thinker news | March 28, 2007

By Daniel Taylor

Definition: Police State, n A state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic, and political life of the people, especially by means of a secret police force.

While the U.K. is ensnared in a grid of electronic surveillance and ever expanding police powers, the United States is following the same trend towards authoritarianism. Before 9/11, the drug war provided the excuse for militarized police and other measures. Today, the attacks of September 11th, 2001 have provided the main foundation upon which wars have been fought overseas, and the exponential expansion of government domestically. Electronic surveillance, expanded police powers, "Free Speech Zones", National Identification cards; the list continues to grow.

The 4th U.S. president, James Madison uttered a prophetic warning to America. Madison said, "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."

As America has witnessed in the past several years since the attacks of September 11th, Madison's words hold painful, undying truth. This truth must be shouted from the mountaintops and spread throughout the land in order to hold back the rising tide of tyranny that threatens to engulf this nation. We've heard the cries from the Republicans while Clinton was in office, warning of authoritarian anti-terrorism measures, only to go silent as one of their own, George W. Bush moved into the white house. The Democrats, who remained predominantly silent during Clinton's term, now softly warn of threats to our freedom. Liberty mindedness has turned from being the standard mindset of freedom loving Americans to a politically expedient attribute. Both political parties have moved America towards a police state, while supporters of each cheer on the destruction of their freedom as they root for Red and Blue.

National ID

As with the United Kingdom, the United States will adopt new regulations for a National Identification card in 2009. The original date for the U.S. card was set for May of 2008, but upon public outcry and opposition to the Real ID act, the government was forced to give at least a bit of leniency, moving the due date ahead a year. The new date, however, does little to address the concerns of citizens. Citizens of the U.K. who refuse the new card will have to "forgo the ability" to have a travel document. Citizens of the United States who do not follow the "voluntary" federal regulations will not be able to fly on a plane, ride a train, or step foot inside a federal building. Several states are also resisting Real ID because of an exorbitant price tag associated with it.

2nd Amendment denied

One of the tenets of a free society is its ability to defend itself. Citizens of New Orleans found themselves bewildered, angry and shocked to find themselves denied of this basic right in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. "No one will be able to be armed... We are going to take all the weapons," said Deputy Chief Warren Riley of New Orleans. ABC news reported on the confiscations. Watch the video here.

The NRA has released a video showing interviews of individuals who had their guns stolen from them. Featured in the video is an elderly woman who was shown being tackled and punched in the face by police in her home after refusing to leave and hand over her handgun. "They didn't care what you're rights were, they were gonna deny 'em," said one man who had his two rifles taken from him at gunpoint. "It's not America as we've known it before, it's changing."

Police State tactics

The role of police and their demeanor towards citizens is changing dramatically in America. One demonstration of this is the article featured in Popular Mechanics titled "Meet The New Supercops." The article praises the new tactics of New York police in the war on terror.

"No one sees them coming. There are no flashing lights, no sirens. The black Suburban simply glides out of Fifth Avenue traffic and pulls into a no-parking zone in front of the Empire State Building. Moments later, four men spill out in combat helmets and heavy body armor: Two carry submachine guns; the others, snub-nosed shotguns."

"The response we usually get is, 'Holy s---!'" Nieves says. "That's the reaction we want. We are in the business of scaring people--we just want to scare the right people."

Similar tactics are being used in Miami, where police conduct random shows of force around public places. Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez commented on the new tactic, saying "people are definitely going to notice it... We want that shock. We want that awe. But at the same time, we don't want people to feel their rights are being threatened. We need them to be our eyes and ears."

A Phoenix Federal Bureau of Investigation terrorism training manual that was circulated during Clinton's administration is shocking to behold. “frequent references to the US constitution” are listed as possible terror suspects, as well as “defenders of the US constitution”. (Front) (Back)

Another more recent terrorism manual, this time from the state of Virginia flatly lists "Property Rights Activists" as domestic terrorists.

During the August 2004 Republican National Convention thousands of protesters gathered in New York to voice their dissent. They were met with fenced in "Free Speech Zones," as well as a makeshift detention facility at an old bus housing building on Pier 57.

The following are chilling photographs taken inside the building. (more information here)


Protesters held in Pier 57


Razor wire inside the building atop chain link fence

Caged in free speech zones, areas where protesters were allowed to gather in an out of the way place were yet another ominous sign of eroded liberty.


Caged in free speech zone, more razor wire


Another shot

The long standing Posse Comitatus Act, which places strict prohibitions on military engaging in domestic law enforcement was undone in October of 2006. The "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122), allows the President to seize control of state National Guardsmen to "suppress public disorder" without the consent of governors. Frank Morales wrote an excellent article detailing the Act,

"Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

Senator Patrick Leahy commented on the Act on September 29, 2006.

"The changes to the Insurrection Act will allow the President to use the military, including the National Guard, to carry out law enforcement activities without the consent of a governor. When the Insurrection Act is invoked posse comitatus does not apply. Using the military for law enforcement goes against one of the founding tenets of our democracy..."

"It.. should concern us all that the Conference agreement includes language that subverts solid, longstanding posse comitatus statutes that limit the military’s involvement in law enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare martial law. There is good reason for the constructive friction in existing law when it comes to martial law declarations."

As information began to surface regarding the legality of the Bush wiretapping plan, the new head of the CIA, Michael Hayden flatly denied the probable cause measure of the 4th amendment during an exchange with reporter Jonathan Landay.

QUESTION: I'm no lawyer, but my understanding is that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution specifies that you must have probable cause to be able to do a search that does not violate an American's right against unlawful searches and seizures. Do you use --
GEN. HAYDEN: No, actually -- the Fourth Amendment actually protects all of us against unreasonable search and seizure.
QUESTION: But the --
GEN. HAYDEN: That's what it says.
QUESTION: But the measure is probable cause, I believe.
GEN. HAYDEN: The amendment says unreasonable search and seizure.
QUESTION: But does it not say probable --
GEN. HAYDEN: No.

Congressman Ron Paul, who is running for President in 2008, was one of the few representatives to speak out on the issue of erosion of liberty soon after 9/11. Paul gave a powerful speech to the House of Representatives in June of 2002 asking the question, "Is America a Police State?" "If we are, what are we going to do about it? If we are not, we need to know if there's any danger that we're moving in that direction," Paul says. He also points out the fact that tyrannical government often arises from popular support after a crisis.

"Most police states, surprisingly, come about through the democratic process with majority support. During a crisis, the rights of individuals and the minority are more easily trampled, which is more likely to condition a nation to become a police state than a military coup. Promised benefits initially seem to exceed the cost in dollars or lost freedom. When people face terrorism or great fear- from whatever source- the tendency to demand economic and physical security over liberty and self-reliance proves irresistible. The masses are easily led to believe that security and liberty are mutually exclusive, and demand for security far exceeds that for liberty."

Other examples not mentioned in this article:

Oregon Law Would Jail War Protesters as Terrorists

The Empire Turns Its Guns on the Citizenry

VIPER Teams Patrol Mass Transit Facilities, Look For Susupicious Individuals

City to Seize Homes Over a $5 Parking Ticket

Police Commissioner Defends Surveillance Of RNC Protestors

FBI Criticized for Patriot Act Use

FBI Director Defends Patriot Act Use To Senators

The Pentagon’s Power to Jail Americans Indefinitely

Cops Caught Stealing Protestors’ Cameras

Spies Among Us

Video: ABC news promotes implantable microchip

FBI Keeps Watch on Activists

America’s Secret Police?

Gingrich defends free speech curbs

 

 


Home
About
Multimedia
Audio
Video
Info Center
Previous Articles From O-T-N
News Archives
Links
Contact
Search

 
home · links · contact