The "North
American Consciousness" and "European Identity"
Efforts underway in America to create social atmosphere favorable to
North American Integration mirror early EU plans
Old-thinker news | Dec. 22, 2007
By Daniel Taylor
If we listen to the mainstream
media - apart from Lou Dobbs -, plans for a North American Union
don't exist. They are a figment of your imagination.
However, scholars and globalist
think tanks have been fine tuning strategies to alter the way
Americans view their national identities to conform to a "North American
consciousness" among the people of Canada, Mexico, and the
United States.
The "Toward a North American
Community?"
conference in 2002,
held by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars stated,
"Further economic, political, and social integration will
depend on how citizens of the three countries define their national
identities and the degree to which they are willing to cede some of
their countries’ sovereignty to a larger entity."
[emphasis added]
"Foreign policy... provides three things for a nation’s citizens: sovereignty,
security, and identity.
Sovereignty dictates that the state’s citizens and government (“we”)
decide policy, identity defines “who we are” as a nation, and
security protects a nation’s sovereignty and identity. Governments must convince citizens that the regional project is
consistent with these three values by expanding the definition of
the “we.”'
[emphasis added]
The website for the Jean Monnet Center of NYU
carries a paper titled "Citizenship of the Union: Towards
post-national membership?". This paper, as did the Toward a
North American Community? conference, examines the sociological
and political atmosphere in relation to integration and surrender of
sovereignty. The only difference is that this paper focuses on the
European Union. The paper cites John McCormick in his 1996 book
"The European Union: Politics and Policies". McCormick
states,
"...certain prerequisites are
needed before [European] integration can proceed, including changes in
mass attitudes that pull people away from nationalism and
toward co-operation, a desire by elites to promote integration
for pragmatic rather than altruistic reasons, and the
delegation of real power to a new supranational authority."
[emphasis added]
The Citizenship of the Union
paper goes on to describe various methods of creating a "European
identity", which are designed to place focus on collective ideas,
centered in the word "European".
"These include the European
passport and driving licence, the European anthem, the European
flag and `consciousness-raising initiatives' such as `European
years'. 1997 is European Year against Racism. The interest lies
not so much in a sober consideration of the empirical effect of
such measures on citizens' consciousnesses but on the
contradiction, highlighted by Shore and Black between official
and semi-official rhetoric which lauds the remarkable strides
towards the creation of `European identity'..."
The striking similarity between the
Toward a North American Community? conference and early European
Union planning strategies should be a blaring warning siren to all
Americans. The current planning among intellectual elites in America represents a
very real intent by globalists to move ahead with North American
integration. Resistance among patriotic Americans is acknowledged by
globalist elites as being a major obstacle to the formation of a
North American community.
This resistance may partially
explain why any mention of a North American Union is quickly
denounced as conspiracy theory by American politicians and leaders
who fear that any official confirmation of such plans would lead to
mass revolt. The European Union seems to be ignoring any dissent as
it moves forward with full force with the
signing of the EU treaty in
Britain.
Will our society be molded into
accepting the "North American consciousness"? The
"evolution by stealth" approach seems to be favored at the moment
while North American integration - whether through superhighways,
economic or political integration - remains highly unpopular.
|